The Tesla is shown at night on a two-lane road with the digital billboard on the left side of the road. A demonstration video shows how a Tesla Model X running the company’s HW3 autopilot would react to the display of a brief image.
#Split second management driver
The researchers focused on two types of an Advanced Driver Assistance System, or ADAS: Tesla’s HW system, which is considered semi-autonomous, and Mobileye 360, an external camera-based system that uses computer-vision algorithms. It was first reported by Wired.Įfforts to reach Tesla and Mobileye weren’t immediately successful. Their paper, “Phantom of the ADAS: Securing Advanced Driver Assistance Systems from Split-Second Phantom Attacks,” is due to be presented at the virtual ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security on Monday.
Rather, the issues “reflect a fundamental flaw of models that detect objects that were not trained to distinguish between real and fake objects,” writes Ben Nassi, one of the researchers, in a preview on his website.įor an attacker, such a trick could be conducted remotely and leave no evidence at the scene of an accident, the researchers say.
#Split second management code
The researchers say the problem is not one of poor code implementation or a security issue, per se. Hackers have compromised digital billboard systems before, often with the aim of imparting humor but also to show the vulnerability of infrastructure-related connected devices.
#Split second management drivers
The report said the leaking pipe had been shut off, but containment was not confirmed.The success of the experiment shows yet another type of potential risk that drivers relying on autopilot systems could face.
Records show the spill was not reported by Amplify Energy, but by Witt O’Brien’s, a crisis and emergency management firm listed on the spill response plan as the point of contact to notify the NRC. Willsher said required agencies were notified “instantly” when the company recognized the leak was from its pipe. The spill plan warned that a break in the pipeline could cause “substantial harm to the environment” and that in a worst-case scenario 3,111 barrels of oil could be released from the pipeline. Smaller leaks were expected to take up to 50 minutes to detect, according to the response plan. For a large leak - 10% or more of the amount of oil flowing through the pipeline - the detection time was estimated at five minutes. But how fast it can pick up on those changes was expected to vary according to the size of the leak. The system was designed to trigger an alarm whenever a change in the flow of oil is detected. for a massive well blowout later that year. Failure to do so has led to criminal prosecutions of companies, including Plains All American Pipeline, which caused a coastal spill near Santa Barbara in 2015, and Southern California Gas Co. Coastal fisheries in the area are closed to commercial and recreational fishing.įederal and state authorities require rapid reporting of a spill. The beaches could remain closed for weeks or longer, a major hit to the local economy. The spill sent up to 126,000 gallons of heavy crude into the ocean off Huntington Beach, and it then washed onto miles of beaches and a protected marshland. The second came six hours later from a federal agency that said a possible oil slick was spotted on satellite imagery, according to reports by the California Office of Emergency Services. The first was from an anchored ship that noticed a sheen on the water. Two early calls about the spill came into the National Response Center, which is staffed by the Coast Guard and notifies other agencies of disasters for quick response.
0 kommentar(er)
